Re: Idea about better configuration options for sort memory

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: "scott(dot)marlowe" <scott(dot)marlowe(at)ihs(dot)com>
Cc: Greg Stark <gsstark(at)mit(dot)edu>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Idea about better configuration options for sort memory
Date: 2004-02-12 17:06:44
Message-ID: 11455.1076605604@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

"scott.marlowe" <scott(dot)marlowe(at)ihs(dot)com> writes:
> On 12 Feb 2004, Greg Stark wrote:
>> dml_sort_mem and ddl_sort_mem ?

> I like those. Are they an accurte representation of what's going on?

No, not particularly ...

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message markw 2004-02-12 17:17:45 Re: Proposed Query Planner TODO items
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2004-02-12 16:36:21 Re: pg_dump and CHECK constraints