Re: [postgis-users] pg_dump -s should use add_geometrycolumn(...)

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org, "Willy-Bas Loos" <willybas(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostGIS Users Discussion <postgis-users(at)postgis(dot)refractions(dot)net>
Subject: Re: [postgis-users] pg_dump -s should use add_geometrycolumn(...)
Date: 2012-08-29 16:02:24
Message-ID: 11452.1346256144@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> writes:
> On Wednesday, August 29, 2012 04:44:14 PM Willy-Bas Loos wrote:
>> pg_dump -s should use add_geometrycolumn(...) instead of creating a
>> column+constraints with normal DDL
>> Because, when you don't dump the data, then the record in geometry_columns
>> is lost.

> That shouldn't be a problem with postgres 2 anymore as far as I understand
> things?

The big picture here is that pg_dump doesn't, and is not likely ever to,
know about anything as extension-specific as add_geometrycolumn().
Rather, if postgis needs some info in a special table geometry_columns,
that should be handled by pg_dump dumping and restoring that table too
(since, again, there is no reason for pg_dump to treat such a table
specially).

Willy hasn't provided enough context for us to know why that approach
might not be working for him, though a first guess is that he tried to
do a selective dump excluding geometry_columns.

I believe there was some discussion awhile back about whether postgis
could dodge this problem by cramming its additional info into type
modifiers (with the geometry-type typmodin and typmodout functions
becoming responsible for accessing the special table). I don't know
if that can fly on syntax grounds, but if it can, I think all the core
infrastructure for it is in place as of 9.1.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Gauthier, Dave 2012-08-29 16:06:08 Re: using vars in ddl in procedure call
Previous Message Nicola Cisternino 2012-08-29 15:56:01 Re: String comparision in PostgreSQL