| From: | Neil Conway <neilc(at)samurai(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Robert Treat <xzilla(at)users(dot)sourceforge(dot)net> |
| Cc: | "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, Greg Sabino Mullane <greg(at)turnstep(dot)com>, pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: PostgreSQL committer history? |
| Date: | 2006-03-09 16:01:24 |
| Message-ID: | 1141920084.8847.32.camel@localhost.localdomain |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-advocacy |
On Thu, 2006-03-09 at 09:22 -0500, Robert Treat wrote:
> I've often wondered how much it would help to have more committers for
> the purpose of having people review & apply smaller patches on their
> own, there by reducing the "busy work" from Tom, Bruce, et al who we
> really would rather focus on bigger patches.
There's nothing stopping you -- most code review is done on
pgsql-patches via email. If you or anyone else wants to contribute,
please go right ahead -- participating in code review certainly doesn't
require commit privileges.
-Neil
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Robert Treat | 2006-03-09 18:21:20 | Re: PostgreSQL committer history? |
| Previous Message | Mike Ellsworth | 2006-03-09 15:46:49 | Re: TurboDBAdmin |