| From: | seth(dot)m(dot)green(at)gmail(dot)com |
|---|---|
| To: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: ACCESS EXCLUSIVE LOCK |
| Date: | 2006-03-02 13:55:10 |
| Message-ID: | 1141307710.506042.246170@t39g2000cwt.googlegroups.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches |
No. Here is the offending SP:
CREATE OR REPLACE FUNCTION update_my_cache() RETURNS void AS '
BEGIN
TRUNCATE TABLE my_cache_table;
INSERT INTO my_cache_table SELECT * FROM
get_my_stuff_to_fill_cache_table();
RETURN;
END
' LANGUAGE plpgsql;
I've checked the SP get_my_stuff_to_fill_cache_table() that is run from
within update_my_cache() and it does not cause locks. So it seems
something else about the update_my_cache() SP is causing this access
exclusive lock which prevents anything from even dirty reading the
table for the entire time it executes (roughly 10 seconds);
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Andrew - Supernews | 2006-03-02 14:07:14 | Re: ACCESS EXCLUSIVE LOCK |
| Previous Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2006-03-02 13:43:23 | Re: ACCESS EXCLUSIVE LOCK |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Andrew - Supernews | 2006-03-02 14:07:14 | Re: ACCESS EXCLUSIVE LOCK |
| Previous Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2006-03-02 13:43:23 | Re: ACCESS EXCLUSIVE LOCK |