Re: Patch Submission Guidelines

From: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog(at)svana(dot)org>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Patch Submission Guidelines
Date: 2006-02-14 22:54:13
Message-ID: 1139957653.1258.1040.camel@localhost.localdomain
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches

On Tue, 2006-02-14 at 17:28 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:

> IMHO the thing we are really seriously short of is patch reviewers.
> Neil and Bruce and I seem to be the only ones doing that much at all,
> and the main burden is falling on Bruce. More eyeballs would help
> much more than throwing machines at the problem.

Well that was the basis of my original suggestion. Publish some
guidelines and everybody becomes a patch reviewer.

Best Regards, Simon Riggs

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andrew Dunstan 2006-02-15 00:04:35 Re: Patch Submission Guidelines
Previous Message Tom Lane 2006-02-14 22:28:54 Re: Patch Submission Guidelines

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andrew Dunstan 2006-02-15 00:04:35 Re: Patch Submission Guidelines
Previous Message Kris Jurka 2006-02-14 22:30:36 Re: add additional options to CREATE TABLE ... AS