From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: psql possible TODO |
Date: | 2006-12-05 21:32:40 |
Message-ID: | 11397.1165354360@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
"Joshua D. Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> writes:
>> But lastly, do we need this at all? It seems like a relatively awkward,
>> highly error-prone way to do what you can do today with control-P and
>> re-execute.
> If you mean control-P as in "paste" then I would say... get your hands
> off the mouse. The mouse is counter productive and it is faster to do
> this:
No, I mean control-P as in "recall the previous entry". What you showed
takes *more* work to recall a recent entry than hitting control-P a few
times. It has vastly greater chance of error, too, ie, executing the
wrong command for lack of any feedback about what it is you're really
about to execute. I will grant that control-P isn't a good way to
recall an entry from dozens or hundreds of commands ago, but that's what
control-R is for; and I don't see that a command number would help any
for that anyway.
> Just like bash.
What we have is just like bash --- at least the parts of it that I use.
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2006-12-05 21:34:51 | Re: psql possible TODO |
Previous Message | Jim C. Nasby | 2006-12-05 21:26:59 | Re: Double entries in log for page slots in beta3 |