| From: | Devrim GUNDUZ <devrim(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Don Hayes <dhayes(at)thprd(dot)com>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: 32/64 architectures for backup/WALs |
| Date: | 2006-01-18 22:25:22 |
| Message-ID: | 1137623122.3808.8.camel@evim.gunduz.org |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
Hi,
On Wed, 2006-01-18 at 17:10 -0500, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> Don Hayes wrote:
> > I saw a posting about not being able to backup/WALs on different
> > architectures for 8.0.6. Is this still true for the current release?
>
> I don't understand what you are asking. You certainly can store the
> backup/WAL files on any architecture you want, but you have to restore
> to the same architecture you used to create the files.
This is the same behaviour as Oracle does. AFAIK they can't replicate
between 32 bit and 64 bit . So Don, what you wrote is still true.
Regards,
--
The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc. 1.503.667.4564
PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support
Managed Services, Shared and Dedicated Hosting
Co-Authors: plPHP, plPerlNG - http://www.commandprompt.com/
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Jim C. Nasby | 2006-01-18 22:37:03 | Re: No heap lookups on index |
| Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2006-01-18 22:10:37 | Re: 32/64 architectures for backup/WALs |