From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | "Jim C(dot) Nasby" <jim(at)nasby(dot)net> |
Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: [PERFORM] Hints proposal |
Date: | 2006-10-12 16:37:46 |
Message-ID: | 11366.1160671066@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-performance |
"Jim C. Nasby" <jim(at)nasby(dot)net> writes:
> Yes, but as I mentioned the idea here was to come up with something that
> is (hopefully) easy to define and implement. In other words, something
> that should be doable for 8.3.
Sorry, but that is not anywhere on my list of criteria for an important
feature. Having to live with a quick-and-dirty design for the
foreseeable future is an ugly prospect --- and anything that puts hints
into application code is going to lock us down to supporting it forever.
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Bucky Jordan | 2006-10-12 16:40:13 | Re: Hints proposal |
Previous Message | D'Arcy J.M. Cain | 2006-10-12 16:36:46 | Re: New version of money type |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Jim C. Nasby | 2006-10-12 16:37:47 | Re: FW: Simple join optimized badly? |
Previous Message | Csaba Nagy | 2006-10-12 16:34:25 | Re: Hints proposal |