From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Ron Johnson <ron(dot)l(dot)johnson(at)cox(dot)net> |
Cc: | pgsql-general(at)postgreSQL(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Database performance comparison paper. |
Date: | 2007-02-16 06:10:46 |
Message-ID: | 11341.1171606246@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
Ron Johnson <ron(dot)l(dot)johnson(at)cox(dot)net> writes:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>> Am 15.02.2007 um 11:21 schrieb Marc Evans:
>> These *peeeeeeep* [deleted] compared MySQL with MyISAM to ACID compliant
>> databases. So why not compare an F-15 to 747? What? Apples and Oranges?
> Bad analogy. Both the F-15 and 747 are high-performance (within
> their problem domains) and have redundancy out the wazoo.
I think it's a fine analogy, precisely because they're both good in
their respective problem domains. Try to carry 500 people from Los
Angeles to Tokyo in an F-15. No? Try to win a dogfight in a 747. No?
But they both fly, so it must be useful to compare them... especially
on the basis of the most simplistic test case you can think of. For
extra points, use *only one* test case. Perhaps this paper can be
described as "comparing an F-15 to a 747 on the basis of required
runway length".
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2007-02-16 06:35:28 | Re: invalid regular expression: invalid backreference number |
Previous Message | vanessa | 2007-02-16 06:04:44 | Is it possible to compress a table any further? |