Re: Database performance comparison paper.

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Ron Johnson <ron(dot)l(dot)johnson(at)cox(dot)net>
Cc: pgsql-general(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
Subject: Re: Database performance comparison paper.
Date: 2007-02-16 06:10:46
Message-ID: 11341.1171606246@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

Ron Johnson <ron(dot)l(dot)johnson(at)cox(dot)net> writes:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>> Am 15.02.2007 um 11:21 schrieb Marc Evans:
>> These *peeeeeeep* [deleted] compared MySQL with MyISAM to ACID compliant
>> databases. So why not compare an F-15 to 747? What? Apples and Oranges?

> Bad analogy. Both the F-15 and 747 are high-performance (within
> their problem domains) and have redundancy out the wazoo.

I think it's a fine analogy, precisely because they're both good in
their respective problem domains. Try to carry 500 people from Los
Angeles to Tokyo in an F-15. No? Try to win a dogfight in a 747. No?
But they both fly, so it must be useful to compare them... especially
on the basis of the most simplistic test case you can think of. For
extra points, use *only one* test case. Perhaps this paper can be
described as "comparing an F-15 to a 747 on the basis of required
runway length".

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2007-02-16 06:35:28 Re: invalid regular expression: invalid backreference number
Previous Message vanessa 2007-02-16 06:04:44 Is it possible to compress a table any further?