Re: 8.x index insert performance

From: Kelly Burkhart <kelly(at)tradebotsystems(dot)com>
To: Ron Peacetree <rjpeace(at)earthlink(dot)net>
Cc: pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: 8.x index insert performance
Date: 2005-11-10 20:46:48
Message-ID: 1131655608.7514.51.camel@krb06.tradebot.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance

On Tue, 2005-11-01 at 10:37 -0500, Ron Peacetree wrote:
> I'm surprised that no one seems to have yet suggested the following
> simple experiment:
>
> Increase the RAM 4GB -> 8GB, tune for best performance, and
> repeat your 100M row insert experiment.
>
> Does overall insert performance change? Does the performance
> drop <foo> rows in still occur? Does it occur in ~ the same place?
> Etc.
>
> If the effect does seem to be sensitive to the amount of RAM in the
> server, it might be worth redoing the experiment(s) with 2GB and
> 16GB as well...

Ron,

I would like to try this, however, since I'm sitting about 1000 miles
away from the server, tweaking things is not as simple as one might
hope. I would also like to understand what is going on before I start
changing things. If I can't get a satisfactory explanation for what I'm
seeing with current hardware, I'll have memory added and see what
happens.

-K

In response to

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Kelly Burkhart 2005-11-10 22:01:57 Re: 8.x index insert performance
Previous Message Charlie Savage 2005-11-10 19:00:51 Re: Index Scan Costs versus Sort