Re: why vacuum

From: Mario Splivalo <mario(dot)splivalo(at)mobart(dot)hr>
To: pgsql-sql(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: why vacuum
Date: 2005-10-27 08:22:51
Message-ID: 1130401371.31435.17.camel@ekim
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-sql

On Wed, 2005-10-26 at 12:09 -0400, Jan Wieck wrote:
> >
>
> You must have missed the FAQ and other side notes about replication in
> the MySQL manual. Essentially MySQL replication is nothing but a query
> duplicating system, with the added sugar of taking care of now() and
> some other non-deterministic things, but not all of them.
>
> Non-deterministic user defined procedures, functions and triggers will
> simply blow MySQL's sophisticated replication apart.
>

That is just not true. I haven't tried MySQL 4 and above, but in 3.5.x
replication wos working as expected, and the load that replication posed
was insignificant. The only TRUE problem was that replication was
unidirectional. That SAME problem has Slony, and other 'replication
systems' available for postgres.

Mike
--
Mario Splivalo
Mob-Art
mario(dot)splivalo(at)mobart(dot)hr

"I can do it quick, I can do it cheap, I can do it well. Pick any two."

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-sql by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Richard Huxton 2005-10-27 09:14:21 Re: handling money type
Previous Message Mario Splivalo 2005-10-27 08:22:41 Re: why vacuum