Re: pg_dump with low priority?

From: Scott Marlowe <smarlowe(at)g2switchworks(dot)com>
To: Bryan Field-Elliot <bryan_lists(at)netmeme(dot)org>
Cc: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: pg_dump with low priority?
Date: 2005-10-24 14:36:40
Message-ID: 1130164600.15546.83.camel@state.g2switchworks.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On Sat, 2005-10-22 at 07:39, Bryan Field-Elliot wrote:
> We have a huge database which must be backed up every day with
> pg_dump. The problem is, it takes around half an hour to produce the
> dump file, and all other processes on the same box are starved for
> cycles (presumably due to I/O) during the dump. It's not just an
> inconvenience, it's now evolved into a serious problem that needs to
> be addressed.
>
> Is there any mechanism for running pg_dump with a lower priority? I
> don't mind if the backup takes two hours instead of half an hour, as
> long as other processes were getting their fair share of cycles.

You could either set up plain old replication via slony / mammoth
replicator, and backup the slave, or setup Point in Time Recovery.

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andrus 2005-10-24 14:40:22 Prevent application log pollution with notice messages
Previous Message Scott Marlowe 2005-10-24 14:32:49 Re: Blank-padding