| From: | Hannu Krosing <hannu(at)skype(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | Luke Lonergan <llonergan(at)greenplum(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Ron Peacetree <rjpeace(at)earthlink(dot)net>, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] A Better External Sort? |
| Date: | 2005-10-01 14:03:52 |
| Message-ID: | 1128175432.5359.11.camel@fuji.krosing.net |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-performance |
On R, 2005-09-30 at 13:38 -0700, Luke Lonergan wrote:
>
> Bulk loading speed is irrelevant here - that is dominated by parsing, which
> we have covered copiously (har har) previously and have sped up by 500%,
> which still makes Postgres < 1/2 the loading speed of MySQL.
Is this < 1/2 of MySQL with WAL on different spindle and/or WAL
disabled ?
--
Hannu Krosing <hannu(at)skype(dot)net>
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | mark | 2005-10-01 14:05:22 | Re: effective SELECT from child tables |
| Previous Message | Martijn van Oosterhout | 2005-10-01 12:13:09 | Re: effective SELECT from child tables |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Ron Peacetree | 2005-10-01 14:22:40 | Re: [HACKERS] A Better External Sort? |
| Previous Message | hubert depesz lubaczewski | 2005-10-01 10:01:04 | Re: database bloat, but vacuums are done, and fsm seems to be setup ok |