Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Open items list for 8.1

From: Neil Conway <neilc(at)samurai(dot)com>
To: "Jim C(dot) Nasby" <jnasby(at)pervasive(dot)com>
Cc: "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org>,Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>,PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Open items list for 8.1
Date: 2005-09-30 22:57:50
Message-ID: 1128121070.8782.2.camel@localhost.localdomain (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Fri, 2005-30-09 at 17:47 -0500, Jim C. Nasby wrote:
> What's wrong with adding pg_cancel_backend(...) RETURNS int as an alias
> for the one that returns boolean, and document that it's deprecated and
> will be removed in the future.

You can't overload functions based on their return type alone.

-Neil



In response to

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Bruce MomjianDate: 2005-09-30 22:58:05
Subject: Re: Open items list for 8.1
Previous:From: Jim C. NasbyDate: 2005-09-30 22:54:49
Subject: Re: On Logging

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group