From: | Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | Darcy Buskermolen <darcy(at)wavefire(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
Subject: | Re: Version number in psql banner |
Date: | 2005-09-01 22:18:25 |
Message-ID: | 1125613105.3956.254.camel@localhost.localdomain |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches |
On Thu, 2005-09-01 at 14:53 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Darcy Buskermolen <darcy(at)wavefire(dot)com> writes:
> > Yes I've seen the same frustration from users, I think the banner should say
> > something along the lines of "psql client version foo connected to server bar
> > version sfoo"
>
> That seems overly verbose, particularly in the normal case where the
> versions are indeed the same. I could live with seeing a display like
> that when the versions are different.
Thats the way Oracle sql*plus has worked for years, so its fairly
acceptable to a great many people without too many questions.
> The other question is what counts as "different" --- do we want to
> complain like this if the minor versions are different?
Which is much harder to define and could itself have a bug in it, so I
prefer the verbose message.... its much better to know for certain every
time.
Best Regards, Simon Riggs
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2005-09-01 22:28:46 | Re: PL/pgSQL: EXCEPTION NOSAVEPOINT |
Previous Message | Marc G. Fournier | 2005-09-01 22:16:38 | Re: ALTER TABLE ( smallinto -> boolean ) ... |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2005-09-01 22:28:46 | Re: PL/pgSQL: EXCEPTION NOSAVEPOINT |
Previous Message | Matt Miller | 2005-09-01 22:14:55 | Re: PL/pgSQL: EXCEPTION NOSAVEPOINT |