From: | Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com |
Cc: | pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org, pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Coverity Inspected, 20 bugs detected! |
Date: | 2005-07-25 06:39:02 |
Message-ID: | 1122273542.21502.383.camel@localhost.localdomain |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-advocacy pgsql-www |
On Sat, 2005-07-23 at 15:24 -0700, Josh Berkus wrote:
> So, two questions:
>
> 1) Do we want to put up a Coverity Inspected button? On the plus side,
> Oracle, MySQL and BerkeleyDB (as well as FreeBSD) have all gone through
> the Coverity checker, so it says good things about our competitiveness to
> other database products. On the negative side, do we really care?
>
> 2) If we want to put up the button, *where*? We don't really have a page
> on the web site for "certifications and awards", but maybe we ought to?
2) is yes, lets have a page for certifications and awards
If 2) then yes to 1) also
Best Regards, Simon Riggs
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Robert Treat | 2005-07-25 13:36:57 | Re: [HACKERS] Enticing interns to PostgreSQL |
Previous Message | Josh Berkus | 2005-07-25 01:19:39 | Re: [HACKERS] Enticing interns to PostgreSQL |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Robert Treat | 2005-07-25 20:17:43 | Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Coverity Inspected, 20 bugs |
Previous Message | Denis Lussier | 2005-07-24 23:33:26 | Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Coverity Inspected, 20 bugs detected! |