Re: Speeding up the Postgres lexer

From: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
Subject: Re: Speeding up the Postgres lexer
Date: 2005-05-24 06:40:43
Message-ID: 1116916843.3844.472.camel@localhost.localdomain
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Mon, 2005-05-23 at 22:43 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Based on the comments so far in this thread, I'll go ahead and commit
> the patch, with some comments attached of course --- in particular a big
> head comment to run flex with -b and see that lex.backup says something
> to this effect.

flex counts the number of times it needs to back up in a variable called
num_backing_up. It tests this to see whether to generate code
differently. ISTM you could have a -x switch to make it generate an
error if num_backing_up > 0.

Would we use the -x switch if we had it? If so I'll submit a patch here
first, then on to GNU. It'll take a while before it comes back round to
us though.

Best Regards, Simon Riggs

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message ITAGAKI Takahiro 2005-05-24 08:23:26 Re: Notification when freespaces empty
Previous Message Achilleus Mantzios 2005-05-24 06:21:18 Re: ARRAY() returning NULL instead of ARRAY[] resp. {}