Re: Learning curves and such (was Re: pgFoundry)

From: Hannu Krosing <hannu(at)skype(dot)net>
To: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Greg Stark <gsstark(at)mit(dot)edu>, Steve Atkins <steve(at)blighty(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Learning curves and such (was Re: pgFoundry)
Date: 2005-05-18 07:40:30
Message-ID: 1116402030.4809.8.camel@fuji.krosing.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On K, 2005-05-18 at 02:23 -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:

> What we do now is not to require the reporter or the developers to
> classify the email traffic, and the burden is on the people looking for
> specific information to find it.
>
> I am not suggesting we change that, but this the trade-off we have made.
> The only classification we do is the TODO list and the release notes ---
> everything else is email searches.

Maybe we should look for some mail-archive software which allows adding
such tagging after the mail is stored in the list, so that once someone
has found the information he was looking for, he could check some
checkboxes or make some selections to make finding the info easier the
next time.

>
--
Hannu Krosing <hannu(at)skype(dot)net>

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Hannu Krosing 2005-05-18 08:06:22 Re: Cost of XLogInsert CRC calculations
Previous Message Hannu Krosing 2005-05-18 07:24:20 Re: Cost of XLogInsert CRC calculations