Re: [PATCHES] Reorganization of spinlock defines

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [PATCHES] Reorganization of spinlock defines
Date: 2003-09-12 14:49:32
Message-ID: 11141.1063378172@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches

Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> He is uncomfortable with the port/*.h changes at this point, so it seems
> I am going to have to add Itanium/Opteron tests to most of those files.

Why don't you try to put together a proposed patch of that kind, and
then we can look to see how big and ugly it is compared to the other?
If the alternative is shown to be really messy, that would sway my
opinion, maybe Marc's too.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2003-09-12 14:54:20 Re: __cpu__ defines
Previous Message Jason Tishler 2003-09-12 14:47:47 Re: [HACKERS] Win32 native port

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2003-09-12 14:54:20 Re: __cpu__ defines
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2003-09-12 14:46:06 Re: [PATCHES] Reorganization of spinlock defines