| From: | tony <tony(at)tgds(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Robin Ericsson <robin(dot)ericsson(at)profecta(dot)se>, "Psql_General (E-mail)" <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] plPHP in core? |
| Date: | 2005-04-05 15:53:57 |
| Message-ID: | 1112716437.19734.44.camel@hush |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general pgsql-hackers |
Le mardi 05 avril 2005 à 08:26 -0700, Joshua D. Drake a écrit :
> Frankly I don't think we should care if PHP is borked on
> their API or build process. We should care if plPHP is:
>
> A. Quality enough software (and yes it needs some work) to
> go into core.
>
> B. Appropriate for the PostgreSQL user base.
>
> Obviously my opinion is that B is met and A is being worked
> on.
I just caught on to this thread. For those of us who don't want PHP
withing shouting distance of our PostgreSQL server what does this mean?
I don't trust PHP or its developers anywhere within the distance of a
long pole... (ancient history but once burned always shy)
Tony
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Hannes Dorbath | 2005-04-05 15:55:40 | Postmaster running out of discspace; Data corruption? |
| Previous Message | Jim C. Nasby | 2005-04-05 15:43:21 | Re: PL/PERL: raise notice, exception ? |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2005-04-05 16:00:09 | Re: [HACKERS] plPHP in core? |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2005-04-05 15:51:21 | Re: Should we still require RETURN in plpgsql? |