| From: | Hannu Krosing <hannu(at)tm(dot)ee> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Cc: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Patent issues and 8.1 |
| Date: | 2005-01-26 11:29:49 |
| Message-ID: | 1106738990.5587.38.camel@fuji.krosing.net |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Ühel kenal päeval (teisipäev, 25. jaanuar 2005, 21:10-0400), kirjutas
Marc G. Fournier:
> On Tue, 25 Jan 2005, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > So if we have to address it we call it 8.0.7 or something. My point is
> > that we don't need to address it until we actually find out the patent
> > is being enforced against someone, and that possibility is quite unlikely.
>
> Ah, so you are advocating waiting *until* the problem exists, even *after*
> we know a) there may be a problem and b) we know that we can fix it ... ?
It may be my englisk skills, as I'm not a native speaker, but your
temporal logic escapes me ...
... waiting *until* the problem exists ... there *may be* a problem ...
so *bruce* advocates waiting *until* there *is* a problem, *we* know it
*may be* (*there* ?) and we know we *can* fix the problem that *may
be* ?
--
Hannu Krosing <hannu(at)tm(dot)ee>
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tommi Maekitalo | 2005-01-26 11:50:34 | IBM patent |
| Previous Message | Pailloncy Jean-Gerard | 2005-01-26 11:29:06 | Re: Patent issues and 8.1 |