Oleg Bartunov <oleg(at)sai(dot)msu(dot)su> writes:
> On Wed, 25 Nov 2009, Tom Lane wrote:
>> I think you altered the wrong function. The function underlying
>> point <@ box is on_pb() not pt_contained_box ... in fact, I don't
>> even see a function named that.
> sorry, I forgot to say, that I created operator
Unless you changed search_path, I think the parser would have preferred
the built-in point <@ box operator to one in "public". Are you sure
your code was being used at all?
regards, tom lane