bgwriter

From: Jeff Davis <jdavis-pgsql(at)empires(dot)org>
To: PgSQL General List <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: bgwriter
Date: 2005-01-07 22:20:16
Message-ID: 1105136417.2886.95.camel@jeff
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

I understand that the bgwriter code will not be changed until 8.1 (I'm
referring to this issue:
<http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2004-12/msg00733.php> ).

After reading through the thread, it's my impression that there exists
some performance problem with the current method of using a percent of
dirty buffers as a GUC parameter under some (but not all) situations.

So, what situations should I watch out for to avoid the performance
problem with 8.0? Is it actually a performance regression from 7.4, or
just not as good as we hoped? Is it a relatively minor issue, or can it
really bog down the server in some situations?

Regards,
Jeff Davis

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2005-01-07 22:23:44 Re: ERROR: cache lookup failed for type 0
Previous Message Tzahi Fadida 2005-01-07 22:01:02 Re: ERROR: cache lookup failed for type 0