Re: Corrupt RTREE index

From: Neil Conway <neilc(at)samurai(dot)com>
To: Scott Marlowe <smarlowe(at)g2switchworks(dot)com>
Cc: Dann Corbit <DCorbit(at)connx(dot)com>, pgsql-general <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Corrupt RTREE index
Date: 2004-12-15 00:39:28
Message-ID: 1103071168.28882.64.camel@localhost.localdomain
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On Tue, 2004-12-14 at 14:12 -0600, Scott Marlowe wrote:
> IS this same issue true for hash or GiST indexes?

Yes, it is: currently, only btree indexes are WAL safe.

(I spent some time recently looking into adding page-level concurrency
and WAL to GiST, but I haven't had a chance to finish that work -- it is
quite a big job...)

-Neil

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Dann Corbit 2004-12-15 00:43:20 Re: Corrupt RTREE index
Previous Message Neil Conway 2004-12-15 00:36:50 Re: Performance suggestions?