From: | Robert Treat <xzilla(at)users(dot)sourceforge(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
Cc: | "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: merging advocacy and "overview" |
Date: | 2004-12-02 17:10:12 |
Message-ID: | 1102007412.2558.63.camel@camel |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-advocacy pgsql-www |
On Thu, 2004-12-02 at 11:57, Joshua D. Drake wrote:
>
> >>> members{a}
> >>
> >>
> >> Doesn't this duplicate the developer site portion?
> >>
> >>> corporate{a}
> >>
> >>
> >> We'll need to come up with some rules on who can appear here. My
> >> thoughts:
> >> 1) Anyone who sponsors a full-time or 1/2 time developer;
> >> 2) Anyone who has sponsored a significant feature in the last 3
> >> versions.
> >
> >
> > Not sure if I agree with a 'time limit' on this one ... there should
> > be some sort of 'history' section ... if we are remembering a
> > contribution, it should be remembered, not 'fade out over time' ...
>
>
> I think Marc has an interesting point. The other issue is what about
> companies who may not sponsor a ton of code but troll the mailing lists?
> Or provide major services like hosting? Or secondary code like the .Net
> provider?
>
This is why we never came up with a guideline...
Robert Treat
--
Build A Brighter Lamp :: Linux Apache {middleware} PostgreSQL
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Josh Berkus | 2004-12-02 17:18:22 | Re: merging advocacy and "overview" |
Previous Message | Joshua D. Drake | 2004-12-02 16:57:07 | Re: merging advocacy and "overview" |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Josh Berkus | 2004-12-02 17:18:22 | Re: merging advocacy and "overview" |
Previous Message | Joshua D. Drake | 2004-12-02 16:57:07 | Re: merging advocacy and "overview" |