| From: | "Andrew Dunstan" <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | <joe(at)mcknight(dot)de> |
| Cc: | <xzilla(at)users(dot)sourceforge(dot)net>, <pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org>, <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, <jgardner(at)jonathangardner(dot)net> |
| Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] source documentation tool doxygen |
| Date: | 2006-01-17 12:42:39 |
| Message-ID: | 1094.24.211.165.134.1137501759.squirrel@www.dunslane.net |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-www |
Joachim Wieland said:
> Do you want to put it on the postgresql.org site nevertheless? Is it
> too big to be mirrored and should be recreated on every webserver? We
> might need one copy for the last version of every major release as well
> as one for cvs. The latter should get updated regularly of course but I
> figure it would be sufficient to do that once a week...
>
The overwhelming amount of development work gets done against HEAD. I would
start with a once a day run against HEAD, and possibly one against the
latest stable branch (currently REL8_1_STABLE in cvs). That would get you
99% of the possible benefit, I think. I don't see any virtue in doing it
against a release as opposed to a stable branch - this is to help
development efforts so it should be against what people should be basing
their development efforts on.
cheers
andrew
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Magnus Hagander | 2006-01-17 12:53:22 | Bad estimate on LIKE matching |
| Previous Message | Joachim Wieland | 2006-01-17 11:24:46 | Re: [HACKERS] source documentation tool doxygen |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2006-01-17 15:18:23 | Re: [HACKERS] source documentation tool doxygen |
| Previous Message | Joachim Wieland | 2006-01-17 11:24:46 | Re: [HACKERS] source documentation tool doxygen |