Re: Point in Time Recovery

From: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Zeugswetter Andreas SB SD <ZeugswetterA(at)spardat(dot)at>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)dcc(dot)uchile(dot)cl>, Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, mascarm(at)mascari(dot)com, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Point in Time Recovery
Date: 2004-07-13 12:47:12
Message-ID: 1089722832.17493.2534.camel@stromboli
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, 2004-07-13 at 13:18, Zeugswetter Andreas SB SD wrote:
> > The starting a new timeline thought works for xlogs, but not for clogs.
> > No matter how far you go into the future, there is a small (yet
> > vanishing) possibility that there is a yet undiscovered committed
> > transaction in the future. (Because transactions are ordered in the clog
> > because xids are assigned sequentially at txn start, but not ordered in
> > the xlog where they are recorded in the order the txns complete).
>
> Won't ExtendCLOG take care of this with ZeroCLOGPage ? Else the same problem
> would arise at xid wraparound, no ?
>

Sounds like a good start...

When PITR ends, we need to stop mid-way through a file. Does that handle
that situation?

Simon Riggs

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2004-07-13 13:06:43 Re: possibly updating techdocs; mysql2pgsql on gborg
Previous Message Zeugswetter Andreas SB SD 2004-07-13 12:18:11 Re: Point in Time Recovery