Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Adding column comment to information_schema.columns

From: Hannu Krosing <hannu(at)tm(dot)ee>
To: Justin Clift <jc(at)telstra(dot)net>
Cc: PostgreSQL Hackers Mailing List <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Adding column comment to information_schema.columns
Date: 2004-07-02 11:57:18
Message-ID: 1088769438.15415.1.camel@fuji.krosing.net (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On R, 2004-07-02 at 05:07, Justin Clift wrote:
> Christopher Kings-Lynne wrote:
> >> There is a huge difference between adhering to a standard and limiting
> >> yourself to a standard.  The real question is whether PostgreSQL's
> >> goal is to support SQL standards, or whether PostgreSQL's goal is to
> >> give PostgreSQL users a useful set of tools.
> > 
> > 
> > There are literally _hundreds_ of fields we could add to the 
> > information_schema.  Either we add them all or we add none of them.
> 
> Well, if we add them (and they would be very useful I reckon) should we 
> ensure there's an obvious PG naming thing happening?
> 
> i.e.  pg_column_comment
> 
> or similar?  Maybe not "pg_" but you know what I mean.

IIRC we were recently told (in this thread) that the SQL standard tells
to end local customisations with underscore, so it would be
'column_comment_'

---------------
Hannu


In response to

Responses

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Merlin MoncureDate: 2004-07-02 12:51:05
Subject: Re: [Re] Re: PREPARE and transactions
Previous:From: Prem GopalanDate: 2004-07-02 11:42:54
Subject: Re: Postgres Crashes

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group