Do we need more emphasis on backup?

From: "Scott Marlowe" <smarlowe(at)qwest(dot)net>
To: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Do we need more emphasis on backup?
Date: 2004-06-22 08:13:44
Message-ID: 1087892024.1187.957.camel@localhost.localdomain
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

I'm wondering if there's some basic failing in how we're presenting
backing up the database on a regular basis.

Maybe even our reputation for reliability hurts a bit here. I'm sure if
PostgreSQL corrupted files all the time or had some other data
reliability problem people would backup religiously.

Now, the SQL documentation set has a tutorial that proceeds it that
really is a great walk through on the features of PostgreSQL, and I was
wondering if we needed an administrative walk through in a similar vein?

It could include load generation scripts written in Perl or PHP or
something like that to populate and exercise the database for
demonstration purposes.

It would include creating, populating, backing up, deleting, and
restoring a database to simulate a catastrophic failure, etc...

With things like tablespaces coming online, more and more administrative
functions are in danger of being road blocks for the beginner if.

I'd be willing to start it on the wiki site if anyone thinks it's a good
idea. Any ideas welcome. I plan on following the basic administrative
guide, just creating a tutorial analog for it.

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Richard Huxton 2004-06-22 08:32:41 Re: PGplSql: Relation 44451 does not exist
Previous Message Hubert Fröhlich 2004-06-22 07:45:44 Re: Postgres "invalid page header"