Re: pg_ctl reload - is it safe?

From:	Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To:	michael(at)synchronicity(dot)com
Cc:	Pgsql-Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject:	Re: pg_ctl reload - is it safe?
Date:	2003-10-14 17:13:33
Message-ID:	10781.1066151613@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views:	Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:	2003-10-11 03:07:59 from Michael Brusser <michael(at)synchronicity(dot)com>  2003-10-11 13:53:08 from Bruno Wolff III <bruno(at)wolff(dot)to>  2003-10-14 16:00:57 from Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>   2003-10-14 16:09:09 from Michael Brusser <michael(at)synchronicity(dot)com>    2003-10-14 17:13:33 from Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>     2003-10-14 19:31:42 from Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>      2003-10-14 19:37:01 from Larry Rosenman <ler(at)lerctr(dot)org>       2003-10-14 19:38:32 from Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>    2003-10-14 18:09:18 from Greg Stark <gsstark(at)mit(dot)edu>     2003-10-14 19:39:17 from "scott(dot)marlowe" <scott(dot)marlowe(at)ihs(dot)com>      2003-10-14 20:02:48 from Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Lists:	pgsql-hackers

In response to

• Re: pg_ctl reload - is it safe? at 2003-10-14 16:09:09 from Michael Brusser

Responses

• Re: pg_ctl reload - is it safe? at 2003-10-14 19:31:42 from Bruce Momjian

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

	From	Date	Subject
Next Message	Josh Berkus	2003-10-14 17:17:55	Re: Request for Info.
Previous Message	Tom Lane	2003-10-14 16:52:57	Re: [HACKERS] Sun performance - Major discovery!