Re: Outdated docs on techdocs

From: Robert Treat <xzilla(at)users(dot)sourceforge(dot)net>
To: "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Cc: David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org>, PostgreSQL WWW <pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Outdated docs on techdocs
Date: 2003-12-18 18:02:16
Message-ID: 1071770536.8935.8726.camel@camel
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-www

On Thu, 2003-12-18 at 12:31, Marc G. Fournier wrote:
> On Thu, 18 Dec 2003, David Fetter wrote:
>
> > I see we need to grasp a nettle here. How many versions can the
> > community support? Even 7.3 is starting to look a little long in the
> > tooth...
>
> If its a matter of existing docs for older versions, IMHO, unlimited ...
>

I think I'm parroting Marc here... if the text is already written, why
not keep it around? We just need to clearly mark it as older
information. If you want to write something new then as far as I am
concerned you can write for the most recent brand new version and to
heck with the older cruft :-)

Robert Treat
--
Build A Brighter Lamp :: Linux Apache {middleware} PostgreSQL

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-www by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Dave Page 2003-12-18 18:07:29 Re: Hello and some questions
Previous Message Robert Treat 2003-12-18 17:57:12 Re: Hello and some questions