Re: Feature freeze progress report

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

- --On Sunday, April 29, 2007 21:30:36 +0200 Stefan Kaltenbrunner
<stefan(at)kaltenbrunner(dot)cc> wrote:

> not sure I fully agree here - I think we could do a bit better on the
> "bug tracking front" but it is a bit unclear if we cn honestly sy that
> "the current process" does not work or is not going to scale in the
> future. Complex patches need time - sometimes much more time than a
> release or even two release cycles - it's unclear if trying to get those
> in more agressively (by having more commiters or applying them earlier)
> might not actually cause more harm due to -HEAD getting less stable and
> causing developers to spend time hunting regressions.

re: -HEAD getting less stable ... we wouldn't be adding just anyone as a
committer, only those that are trusted to know what they are doing ... even
'slapping in a patch', I would expect it to have some sort of preliminary
review by *someone* with a bit of knowledge in that aspect of the code ...

- ----
Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org)
Email . scrappy(at)hub(dot)org MSN . scrappy(at)hub(dot)org
Yahoo . yscrappy Skype: hub.org ICQ . 7615664
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (FreeBSD)

iD8DBQFGNQrf4QvfyHIvDvMRAoUqAKDKZY8rThsQi1vTKeQgq/c4HPIyzQCfe9o2
2fHy763eMw/hxGrMnDwXnLM=
=g6E8
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----