Re: Point-in-time data recovery - v.7.4

From: Dave Cramer <pg(at)fastcrypt(dot)com>
To: "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
Cc: Gaetano Mendola <mendola(at)bigfoot(dot)com>, "pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>, "scott(dot)marlowe" <scott(dot)marlowe(at)ihs(dot)com>
Subject: Re: Point-in-time data recovery - v.7.4
Date: 2003-11-19 13:32:36
Message-ID: 1069248756.1992.4.camel@localhost.localdomain
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-admin pgsql-general

So are you donating your replication work to the community then? Or do
we still have to write PITR?

Dave
On Tue, 2003-11-18 at 19:55, Joshua D. Drake wrote:
> > I think the opposit:
> >
> > Once the PITR is written it can be used for Replication as side
> > effect.
> >
> Command Prompt has found the opposite to be the case. It is our
> replication product
> that is going to allow PITR, even from 7.3.
>
> Sincerely,
>
> Joshua Drake
>
>
>
> > For example the Sybase Replication is implemented in this way.
> >
> >
> > Regards
> > Gaetano Mendola
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> > TIP 4: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
>

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-admin by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message mail 2003-11-19 13:45:36 Re: Postgresql DB on a live cd
Previous Message acoutinho 2003-11-19 12:02:44 RES: using vacuumdb in crontab

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Rob Sell 2003-11-19 13:44:06 Re: Optimizing query
Previous Message Uros 2003-11-19 12:25:46 Re: Optimizing query