| From: | Robert Treat <xzilla(at)users(dot)sourceforge(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Rajesh Kumar Mallah <mallah(at)trade-india(dot)com>, Jeff <threshar(at)torgo(dot)978(dot)org>, JanWieck(at)yahoo(dot)com, pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: MySQLs' "FOREIGN KEYS¨ |
| Date: | 2003-11-10 18:47:18 |
| Message-ID: | 1068490038.10944.12605.camel@camel |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-advocacy |
On Mon, 2003-11-10 at 13:04, Josh Berkus wrote:
> Guys,
>
> > Ok one thing that i think is good and MySQL enforces is INDEXES on
> > both the keys otherwise it gives ERROR 1005. I think there was a old
> > thread on "Indexes on Foreign keys".
>
> FYI, the MySQL team (per Zak Greant) asked me to thank you for the great Q/C
> you're doing on MySQL. Seriously, he said this to me at PHPCon.
>
> It's an odd thought, but maybe we should focus a little more on PostgreSQL and
> let the MySQL people find their own bugs?
>
Maybe they already tried looking for bugs in PostgreSQL and gave up ;-)
Robert Treat
--
Build A Brighter Lamp :: Linux Apache {middleware} PostgreSQL
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Christopher Browne | 2003-11-10 18:55:26 | Re: FW: [webmaster] Comparison to MySQL |
| Previous Message | Josh Berkus | 2003-11-10 18:04:46 | Re: MySQLs' "FOREIGN KEYS¨ |