Re: Bug in CHECK constraints statement reverse engineering.

From: Ivan <Ivan-Sun1(at)mail(dot)ru>
To: "Dave Page" <dpage(at)vale-housing(dot)co(dot)uk>
Cc: pgadmin-support(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Bug in CHECK constraints statement reverse engineering.
Date: 2005-05-20 09:00:58
Message-ID: 1067494659.20050520130058@mail.ru
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgadmin-support

Hello Dave,

DP> Hi,

DP> pgAdmin does do this correctly. In order to run at a reasonable speed,
DP> pgAdmin caches details of objects read from the database, rather than
DP> running queries every time you select one. If you rename an object such
DP> as a function, it doesn't always know that that action may cause a
DP> property of another object to be changed, thus pgAdmin may continue to
DP> show the old definition.

DP> To force a reload, right-click a node in the treeview and select the
DP> 'Refresh' option.

You were right on a half - pgAdmin do this correctly for tables check
constraints, but for domain definition 'Refresh' and even closing
pgAdmin and restarting postmaster doesn't help :) -
I see:

CREATE DOMAIN "TestDomain"
AS int4
CONSTRAINT TestDomain_check CHECK "Check_IntegerGreaterZero"(VALUE);

though function were renamed.

By the way it will be great to add quoting of domain's constraint name
in the definition pane (right bottom).

Thank you for support.

--
Best regards,
Ivan mailto:Ivan-Sun1(at)mail(dot)ru

In response to

Browse pgadmin-support by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Dave Page 2005-05-20 09:31:05 Re: Bug in CHECK constraints statement reverse engineering.
Previous Message Dave Page 2005-05-20 08:30:34 Re: Bug in CHECK constraints statement reverse engineering.