Re: Unicode upper() bug still present

From: Hannu Krosing <hannu(at)tm(dot)ee>
To: Tatsuo Ishii <t-ishii(at)sra(dot)co(dot)jp>
Cc: zakkr(at)zf(dot)jcu(dot)cz, peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net, tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Unicode upper() bug still present
Date: 2003-10-21 09:27:28
Message-ID: 1066728448.7917.14.camel@fuji.krosing.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Tatsuo Ishii kirjutas T, 21.10.2003 kell 12:07:
> > Why cannot do PostgreSQL as 100% pure Unicode system? We can do
> > conversion from/to others encodings as client/server communication
> > extension, but internaly in BE we can use only pure Unicode data. I
> > think a lot of things will more simple...
>
> Please don't do that. There's a known issue of round trip conversion
> between Unicode and other encodings

Are these unsolvable even in theory ?

-------------
Hannu

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tatsuo Ishii 2003-10-21 09:30:03 Re: Unicode upper() bug still present
Previous Message Tatsuo Ishii 2003-10-21 09:07:13 Re: Unicode upper() bug still present