| From: | "Matthew T(dot) O'Connor" <matthew(at)zeut(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | Gaetano Mendola <mendola(at)bigfoot(dot)com> |
| Cc: | "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Autovacuum readme |
| Date: | 2003-10-09 03:24:31 |
| Message-ID: | 1065669871.14086.18.camel@zeutrh9 |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, 2003-10-08 at 18:27, Gaetano Mendola wrote:
> I found on the readme the following lines:
> deleteThreshold is equal to:
> vacuum_base_value + (vacuum_scaling_factor * "number of tuples in
> the table")
>
> insertThreshold is equal to:
> analyze_base_value + (analyze_scaling_factor * "number of tuples in
> the table")
> may be here deleteThreshold shall be AnalyzeThreshold and
> insertThreshold shall be VacuumThreshold
>
>
> am I missing something?
No, I don't think you are missing anything, this is a left over from
early development before I changed the thresholds delete and insert to
vacuum and analyze. So you are correct.
Matthew T. O'Connor
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2003-10-09 03:40:07 | Re: _GNU_SOURCE |
| Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2003-10-09 03:19:51 | Re: [HACKERS] Sun performance - Major discovery! |