Re: 7.4 Features

From: Neil Conway <neilc(at)samurai(dot)com>
To: Robert Treat <xzilla(at)users(dot)sourceforge(dot)net>
Cc: "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Advocacy <pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: 7.4 Features
Date: 2003-10-08 16:56:16
Message-ID: 1065632176.3424.6.camel@tokyo
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-advocacy

On Wed, 2003-10-08 at 09:39, Robert Treat wrote:
> Yes, you can :-) pg_autovacuum and better index space management should
> be big improvements from a maintenance standpoint.

Are you sure that pg_autovacuum is sufficiently refined to be worth
boasting about?

(By which I mean, "I don't think pg_autovacuum is sufficiently refined
to be worth boasting about" -- my understanding that it was agreed that
a client-side implementation was just meant as a prototype.)

-Neil

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-advocacy by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jeff 2003-10-08 17:05:28 Re: Presentation
Previous Message Josh Berkus 2003-10-08 16:52:16 Re: 7.4 Features