| From: | Neil Conway <neilc(at)samurai(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, Stephan Szabo <sszabo(at)megazone(dot)bigpanda(dot)com>, Jan Wieck <JanWieck(at)Yahoo(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, PostgreSQL Patches <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] Open 7.4 items |
| Date: | 2003-10-06 00:22:38 |
| Message-ID: | 1065399757.466.24.camel@tokyo |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches |
On Sun, 2003-10-05 at 19:58, Tom Lane wrote:
> That's a fairly useless place to put it, though, since someone would
> only think to look at sort_mem if they already had a clue. It should
> be mentioned under bulk data load (in performance tips chapter)
Attached is a doc patch that does this. The way I've worded it may not
be the best, though.
> and perhaps also in dump/restore procedures.
It's already mentioned there.
Should we also suggest turning off fsync when doing restores?
(BTW, is there a reason the docs consistently call them "B-tree
indexes", not "B+-tree indexes"?)
-Neil
| Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
|---|---|---|
| sort_mem_restore_docs-2.patch | text/x-patch | 3.8 KB |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Christopher Kings-Lynne | 2003-10-06 01:41:52 | Re: Day of week question |
| Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2003-10-06 00:12:49 | Re: Open 7.4 items |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Christopher Kings-Lynne | 2003-10-06 01:35:53 | Re: fix log_min_duration_statement logic error |
| Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2003-10-06 00:12:49 | Re: Open 7.4 items |