Re: State of Beta 2

From: Ron Johnson <ron(dot)l(dot)johnson(at)cox(dot)net>
To: PgSQL General ML <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: State of Beta 2
Date: 2003-09-27 22:27:48
Message-ID: 1064701668.23957.96.camel@haggis
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On Sat, 2003-09-27 at 17:13, Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> > Tom Lane wrote:
> >> The reason that it needs to be rewritten in C is that it needs access to
> >> internal stuff that the backend doesn't expose.
>
> > True, but doing all that text manipulation is C is going to be very hard
> > to do and maintain.
>
> Text manipulation? I don't think that pg_upgrade has to do much text
> manipulation. (The shell-script version might do so, but that's only
> because it has to cast the problem in terms of program I/O.)

There's always the general point that C has more pitfalls (mainly
from pointers/free()/malloc(), and HLLs do more for you, thus you
have to code less, and, consequently, there are fewer bugs.

--
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Ron Johnson, Jr. ron(dot)l(dot)johnson(at)cox(dot)net
Jefferson, LA USA

484,246 sq mi are needed for 6 billion people to live, 4 persons
per lot, in lots that are 60'x150'.
That is ~ California, Texas and Missouri.
Alternatively, France, Spain and The United Kingdom.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Joshua D. Drake 2003-09-27 22:54:22 Re: State of Beta 2
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2003-09-27 22:21:33 Re: State of Beta 2