Catalog vs. user table format (was Re: State of Beta 2)

On Sat, 2003-09-20 at 11:17, Tom Lane wrote:
> "Marc G. Fournier" <scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org> writes:
> > No, I'm not suggesting no catalog changes ... wait, I might be wording
> > this wrong ... there are two changes that right now requires a
> > dump/reload, changes to the catalogs and changes to the data structures,
> > no? Or are these effectively inter-related?
>
> Oh, what you're saying is no changes in user table format. Yeah, we

Whew, we're finally on the same page!

So, some definitions we can agree on?
"catalog change": CREATE or ALTER a pg_* table.
"on-disk structure", a.k.a. "user table format": the way that the
tables/fields are actually stored on disk.

So, a catalog change should *not* require a dump/restore, but an
ODS/UTF change should.

Agreed?

--
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Ron Johnson, Jr. ron(dot)l(dot)johnson(at)cox(dot)net
Jefferson, LA USA

"they love our milk and honey, but preach about another way of living"
Merle Haggard, "The Fighting Side Of Me"