From: | Ron Johnson <ron(dot)l(dot)johnson(at)cox(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | PgSQL General ML <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: State of Beta 2 |
Date: | 2003-09-17 13:36:46 |
Message-ID: | 1063805806.25251.1416.camel@haggis |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
On Wed, 2003-09-17 at 03:45, Kaare Rasmussen wrote:
[snip]
> Some people have claimed that the big commercial databases don't change their
> on-disk represantation anymore. Maybe PostgreSQL could try to aim for this
> goal. At least try to get the on-disk changes ready for 7.5 - with or without
> the functionality to use it. I think that any pg_* table changes could be
> done with a small and efficient pg_upgrade.
[snip]
I think changes in the system catalog should be separated from
changes in the physical on-disk structures (i.e. how tables and
indexes are stored).
Maybe I'm totally wrong, but ALTERing the pg_* tables during each
version upgrade should be relatively easy to script, when the phys-
ical on-disk structures have been solidified.
--
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Ron Johnson, Jr. ron(dot)l(dot)johnson(at)cox(dot)net
Jefferson, LA USA
The difference between drunken sailors and Congressmen is that
drunken sailors spend their own money.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2003-09-17 13:47:08 | Re: Idea for improving speed of pg_restore |
Previous Message | Marc G. Fournier | 2003-09-17 13:20:50 | Re: State of Beta 2 |