Re: FK type mismatches?

From: Robert Treat <xzilla(at)users(dot)sourceforge(dot)net>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
Cc: Neil Conway <neilc(at)samurai(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: FK type mismatches?
Date: 2003-09-05 21:40:37
Message-ID: 1062798037.11019.324.camel@camel
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Fri, 2003-09-05 at 17:06, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> Neil Conway writes:
>
> > Should this produce a warning?
> >
> > nconway=# create table a (b int4 unique);
> > NOTICE: CREATE TABLE / UNIQUE will create implicit index "a_b_key" for
> > table "a"
> > CREATE TABLE
> > nconway=# create table c (d int8 references a (b));
> > NOTICE: CREATE TABLE will create implicit trigger(s) for FOREIGN KEY
> > check(s)
> > CREATE TABLE
>
> I don't think so. We don't produce warnings in other cases of potential
> index mismatches either.
>

In all this discussion of NOTICE vs. WARNING, can someone remind me the
logic for INFO? I can't seem to recall the differentiator there either.

Robert Treat
--
Build A Brighter Lamp :: Linux Apache {middleware} PostgreSQL

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Sean Chittenden 2003-09-05 21:53:57 Examining the output of: ldd `which postgres`
Previous Message Robert Treat 2003-09-05 21:36:12 Re: Logging improvements and rehashing