| From: | Ron Johnson <ron(dot)l(dot)johnson(at)cox(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | PgSQL General ML <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Linux ready for high-volume databases? |
| Date: | 2003-08-26 07:55:42 |
| Message-ID: | 1061884542.15963.14.camel@haggis |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
On Mon, 2003-08-25 at 16:28, Gregory S. Williamson wrote:
> One of our sysads sent this link ... wondering if there is any comment on it from the world of actual users of linux and a database.
>
> <http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&cid=1738&ncid=738&e=9&u=/zd/20030825/tc_zd/55311>
"Weak points include lack of available tools, ease of use and ease
of installation"
Sounds like he needs point-and-drool tools...
On the other hand, could even a beefy Linux 2.4 *today* system handle
a 24x7 500GB db that must process 6-8M OLTP-style transactions per
day, while also getting hit by report queries?
Don't think of this as a troll, because I really don't know, even
though I do know that MVS, OpenVMS & Solaris can. (I won't even
ask about toys like Windows and FreeBSD.)
--
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Ron Johnson, Jr. ron(dot)l(dot)johnson(at)cox(dot)net
Jefferson, LA USA
"Knowledge should be free for all."
Harcourt Fenton Mudd, Star Trek:TOS, "I, Mudd"
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Shridhar Daithankar | 2003-08-26 08:06:20 | Re: Linux ready for high-volume databases? |
| Previous Message | mp torre | 2003-08-26 07:51:04 | unsubscribe |