Re: BIT vs boolean

From: Kim Ho <kho(at)redhat(dot)com>
To: Fernando Nasser <fnasser(at)redhat(dot)com>
Cc: Darin Ohashi <DOhashi(at)maplesoft(dot)com>, pgsql-jdbc(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: BIT vs boolean
Date: 2003-06-27 21:49:19
Message-ID: 1056750559.5081.12.camel@cpe000475c4cd62-cm013279901416.cpe.net.cable.rogers.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-jdbc

On Fri, 2003-06-27 at 16:33, Fernando Nasser wrote:
> I think there is a patch posted for this already.
> Kim can confirm if that is so.
>

I don't have one for it, but I could whip one up fairly quickly.

I was going to do it for my patch, but I got sidetracked apparently. I
remember looking at it though. The reason why it doesn't work is:

It is actually
insert into bittable values (b'1');
instead of
insert into bittable values (true);

Will look at it either later tonight or tomorrow.

Cheers,

Kim

In response to

Browse pgsql-jdbc by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Kim Ho 2003-06-27 22:28:27 Re: Allow setObject(x,y,Types.BIT) if y is a Number &
Previous Message Garrick Dasbach 2003-06-27 20:57:25 Re: executeQuery and busy waiting