Re: suspicious pointer/integer coersion

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
Cc: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: suspicious pointer/integer coersion
Date: 2005-07-10 21:17:33
Message-ID: 10560.1121030253@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> writes:
> Works for me. There are some other things about the procdesc stuff I'm
> trying to sort out (especially if we should be storing per-call info
> inside it).

Hmm, probably not ... check to see if a recursive plperl function
behaves sanely. (This might not have been much of an issue before
we had SPI support in plperl, since there was no way to recurse;
but it is an issue now.)

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2005-07-10 21:25:38 Re: plperl warning
Previous Message David Fetter 2005-07-10 20:40:04 Re: Hide source code