Re: Text format protocol representation

From: Hannu Krosing <hannu(at)tm(dot)ee>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Greg Stark <gsstark(at)mit(dot)edu>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Text format protocol representation
Date: 2003-05-23 05:27:49
Message-ID: 1053667669.3037.5.camel@fuji.krosing.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Tom Lane kirjutas N, 22.05.2003 kell 18:38:
> Greg Stark <gsstark(at)mit(dot)edu> writes:
> > Oh, I don't. I was just mentioning that if you append a nul in the protocol
> > and allow applications to use that instead of the length provided then you've
> > pretty much committed to never allowing nuls in text/varchars.
>
> Um. Well, there isn't any such assumption in the protocol (and I'm agin
> Peter's suggestion to put one in), but realistically I don't see us ever
> allowing \0 in external-text-representation strings. It would break too
> many things on both client and server sides, and the payback is too small.
>
> The cases I can think of where you'd like to allow \0 are really binary
> data, not text, and we now have respectably clean support for binary
> I/O.

I know about the /O part but what about I/ ?

Are \0's handled cleanly in INSERT statements ?

Or can new protocol send binary bind variables for prepared statements ?

> So the need to allow it seems to me to have dropped way down, too.

-------
Hannu

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message You Lun 2003-05-23 05:30:05 index on function
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2003-05-23 04:06:57 Re: Password authentication confusion.