Re: Techdocs v2 - status

From: Robert Treat <xzilla(at)users(dot)sourceforge(dot)net>
To: Richard Huxton <dev(at)archonet(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org, Justin Clift <justin(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Techdocs v2 - status
Date: 2003-05-16 14:00:37
Message-ID: 1053093638.23805.7.camel@camel
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-advocacy

Well, Justin kind of jumped the gun with the whole plone thing, so I'd
ask that you just wait a couple days while I finish moving techdocs over
to the new VM. After that we can hash out a game plan, as we've clearly
lost any sense of direction with the passing of the torch from justin to
josh to greg with justin now jumping back in and me trying to keep ahead
of them all...

Robert Treat

On Fri, 2003-05-16 at 08:27, Richard Huxton wrote:
> Justin/others
>
> With the mention of techdocs-v2 and this plone package in the "Writers needed"
> thread I wondered what the situation was with community-supplied docs.
>
> Existing documents - should I
> 1. Move my stuff out of techdocs/guides?
> 2. Wait a bit
>
> New documents
> 1. Point others to the site to add new documents
> 2. Add them myself for the moment
> 3. Wait a bit
>
> I ask now because Matthew Nuzum has been kind enough to write up a brief howto
> on using ssh to link Access via ODBC to PG on linux.
> --
> Richard Huxton
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 3: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
> subscribe-nomail command to majordomo(at)postgresql(dot)org so that your
> message can get through to the mailing list cleanly

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-advocacy by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Richard Huxton 2003-05-16 15:08:15 Re: Techdocs v2 - status
Previous Message Diogo de Oliveira Biazus 2003-05-16 12:33:30 Re: [Fwd: [HACKERS] Heads up: 7.3.3 this Wednesday]