Re: Small fix for _equalValue()

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Thomas Lockhart <lockhart(at)fourpalms(dot)org>
Cc: Fernando Nasser <fnasser(at)redhat(dot)com>, pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Small fix for _equalValue()
Date: 2002-03-07 16:39:02
Message-ID: 10501.1015519142@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches

Thomas Lockhart <lockhart(at)fourpalms(dot)org> writes:
> If this should be done differently I'm happy for suggestions...

I think DEFAULT should probably be represented by a NULL, not by
a Value node containing a null string pointer.

I'm willing to do the work if no one else feels strongly about it ;-)

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Thomas Lockhart 2002-03-07 16:50:09 Re: Small fix for _equalValue()
Previous Message Thomas Lockhart 2002-03-07 16:36:39 Re: Small fix for _equalValue()

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Thomas Lockhart 2002-03-07 16:50:09 Re: Small fix for _equalValue()
Previous Message Thomas Lockhart 2002-03-07 16:36:39 Re: Small fix for _equalValue()