Re: contrib and licensing

From: Rod Taylor <rbt(at)rbt(dot)ca>
To: mlw <pgsql(at)mohawksoft(dot)com>
Cc: PostgreSQL Development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: contrib and licensing
Date: 2003-04-01 21:31:16
Message-ID: 1049232676.35327.115.camel@jester
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, 2003-04-01 at 16:31, mlw wrote:
> I know nothing in contrib should be GPL, I have no problem with that.
> The question is the requirement of a GPL library to build a contrib project.
>
> My SOAP/XML function will probably require my LGPL library as there is a
> lot of code I have written that I would need to implement it.
>
> Is there any sort of philosophical problem with that?

There is a big difference between an LGPL'd library and a GPL'd library.

The latter may have problems as I believe your code should be GPL'd, but
the former should be fine.

--
Rod Taylor <rbt(at)rbt(dot)ca>

PGP Key: http://www.rbt.ca/rbtpub.asc

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message mlw 2003-04-01 21:31:50 contrib and licensing
Previous Message Hiroshi Inoue 2003-04-01 21:26:26 Re: updateable cursors & visibility