From: | Rod Taylor <rbt(at)rbt(dot)ca> |
---|---|
To: | mlw <pgsql(at)mohawksoft(dot)com> |
Cc: | PostgreSQL Development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: contrib and licensing |
Date: | 2003-04-01 21:31:16 |
Message-ID: | 1049232676.35327.115.camel@jester |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, 2003-04-01 at 16:31, mlw wrote:
> I know nothing in contrib should be GPL, I have no problem with that.
> The question is the requirement of a GPL library to build a contrib project.
>
> My SOAP/XML function will probably require my LGPL library as there is a
> lot of code I have written that I would need to implement it.
>
> Is there any sort of philosophical problem with that?
There is a big difference between an LGPL'd library and a GPL'd library.
The latter may have problems as I believe your code should be GPL'd, but
the former should be fine.
--
Rod Taylor <rbt(at)rbt(dot)ca>
PGP Key: http://www.rbt.ca/rbtpub.asc
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | mlw | 2003-04-01 21:31:50 | contrib and licensing |
Previous Message | Hiroshi Inoue | 2003-04-01 21:26:26 | Re: updateable cursors & visibility |